TVA does a policy 180
In a lot of the south the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a pretty big deal.
TVA is the quasi-goverment agency tasked with flood control, electrical power generation, and economic development in a 7 state area.
They got started back in 1933 when Congress formed them and put them to work on flood control in the Tennessee Valley region.
Building dams was pretty controversial back then (and still is for some) because they had to acquire tens of thousands of acres of land that would soon be flooded once the dams were built and rivers became lakes.
Using the government’s power of eminent domain people were forced to sell their land, often family farms in the same family for generations, and relocate.
TVA recently opened those old wounds when they approved a sale of a 500 acre parcel of lakefront property in the Chattanooga, Tennessee area to a private developer for an upscape residential project.
In this sale/land swap the developer ‘traded’ TVA 1,100 acres of other land for the lakefront property. My immediate thought was if his 1,100 acres is essentially the same as the waterfront property then why doesn’t he just build his project on land he already owns.
The answer was 200 of his acres was an island that was inaccessible except by water, 700 was on a mountaintop, also pretty inaccessible, and the rest was 200 acres of boondocks.
Not surprisingly that deal generated a pretty huge outcry from conservationists and the public in general.
Apparently newly sensitive to public opinion, TVA has now reversed it’s land use policies and says in an article in today’s Knoxville News-Sentinel http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/national/article/0,1406,KNS_350_5032086,00.html that it will no longer sell land for private residential development if the new policy is approved.
Public comments are currently running 75% in favor of the the policy with over 900 comments to date.
“It may open a few cans of worms out there,” TVA director Susan Williams of Knoxville said of the new policy, which was recommended by the community relations committee that she chairs.
But Williams said the proposal reflects the wishes of at least 75 percent of the more than 900 comments her panel received during a public hearing in August.
“We heard overwhelmingly that citizens wanted TVA’s lands to be used for public recreation and public access,” she said. “I think this board is very aware of the importance of TVA’s land and the limited amount of land that is out there, and the importance of all that to the valley and to the public.”